Every compaines not able to buy such a highly comparitive price software to do involve in testing because cost of automation is too high as compared to Manual Testing. After doing the testing manual and s/w is compatible to run on automations thatswhy compaines prefered Manual tester as compared to Automation.
1) Lack of expert resource
2) frequenct changes of Application
3) Budget issue with client and Management
4) Software and Hardware compatiblity
But i suggested we will do Performance testing through open source software to test load capacity ....
Let me know if i m wrong.. mail me to firstname.lastname@example.org thanks,
I am not agreeing with some points like software and hardware compatibility. All the automation tools are developed with keeping in mind of software and hardware compatibility. So there is no issue of software and hardware compatibility.
Second thing is open source software for Performance test, which is not totally recommendable because all the functions are not available in trail version and you also not claimed for any wrong output. Also due to the error of tools and lack of knowledge on tools there is a chance to produce of wrong analytical results.
If any one have any concern on this please update here.
One of the most important aspect why companies preffer manual is that no matter whatever the advanced tool is available in the market it fails to identify bugs that are found manually campared automation.100% automation is never possible.Most crtical bugs are uncovered in manual testing takes an edge over automation.Even while doing performance testing tough we have so many tools but still it is tested manually with many users to test the application behaviour in real senario.So the end point is automation is helpful in testing only the non critical areas.
Testing is an Integral part of any software development cycle.Manual Testing is preferred over Automation is just bcoz dere r some areas which cant be automated.
Installation/ Uninstallation Testing
At the same time Automation testing is dere bt its not easy for every company to afford tool and resources.
Even all projects can't be automated as it cannot wear such expenses.At the End of the day i must conclude that Manual Testing is not going to get out of market despite wht ever technologies might cum into picture.
• Proficiency is required to write the automation test scripts.
• Debugging the test script is major issue. If any error is present in the test script, sometimes it may lead to deadly consequences.
• Test maintenance is costly in case of playback methods. Even though a minor change occurs in the GUI, the test script has to be rerecorded or replaced by a new test script.
• Maintenance of test data files is difficult, if the test script tests more screens.
Manual testing comes or preferred first, as every application needs to checked against requirement specifications. If requirement specifications are stable and application is 90% as per specification then any company thinks to automate that process either by using Open source or Commercial tools depends on the budget of the company.
Manual testing is compulsory before automation testing.
Most of the companies as per their organization structure, either a Manual tester or Test Manager or Test Lead will decide which modules or which part of the functionality should be automated.
Rest of the main points are discussed in previous discussions.