Quality Testing

Quality is delighting customers

Why almost all the software companies preferred MANUAL Testing?

Hi,

Why almost all the software companies preferred MANUAL Testing even so many automation tools (open source, HP Tools, IBM Tools, etc…) are present in the market?

Is there any reason?

Thanks,
Priya

Views: 646

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

see manual testing is preferred because people can be easily trained. In automation you need to have flavor of coding within you. its not present in everybody. instead wasting time and money in training them for hours companies prefer manual testing!

There are other constraints of budget, cost also associated with it.
Good question.
Now a days most of the projects are testing by manual.thats y all companies are looking for manual testers.

Regards
OMKAR M (Bangalore)
+91-9538477468
Mainly its because of the budget. Either if the client bares the cost or if it is affordable and profitable in automation companies will surely in corporate automation testing.
Following few reasons are there so that not all, maximum company is looking for Manual Testing.

1. Budget not allowed for Testing
a. Tool cost
b. Resources Cost
c. Training Cost
2. Available open source tools are Un-Compatibility / miss match with requirement
3. Not Support with Time Frame
3. Requirement Changes frequently
4. Resources unavailability

Regards,
P.Panda (Pune)
This very important question.according to me , here are few points.

1. Automation tool cost
2. Training cost to employee.
3.Most of deadline based job, everyone can prefer to manual
testing.
4.Mangment are not keen to it.
5.If requirment continues changing
6.Untrained employee & lack of knowledge of tool

Regards
Vivek
I agree with your answer Vivek.
Hi Guys,

But all the company has to do automation testing when they are coming under "Performance”. No one have alternate ways for performance test. It is simply not possible to do the manual test for performance bottleneck identification and if application released without testing of performance, then in future it is very difficult and very expensive to client as well as companies.

If any one has any other view please replies here.

Regards,
P. Panda
hi priya ,

To my knowledge , there are several reasons we can shoot,

1)It depends on the type the appln
2) budgetary Issues
3) technical difficulties
4) even if u want u go for automation , we need to go for executing the entire appln once manually to define the stability of the appln
5) time taking process ( if the team is not having technical knowledge it will be a great difficult for organization to provide training again which takes lots of time to get the things in track .)
6)we can't test all the functionalities with automation ( automation is only for valid data ).
7)maintaineace of the documents , builds and the environments proves to very costly.


Correct me if iam wrong ,

Gouri sankar ,
0-9912097981
Manual testing can be started at the moment, with the available resources quickly. Automation involves writing scripts, parameterising the data, making it reusable, and most importantly time and skilled QA resources are required(expensive) to develop the auto-scripts. If there are lot of UI changes build to build, then automation will be ineffective.
Guys Gusy !!!!! Hello there to all !!!!

Adding to same chain I need few clarification,

One!! How cost will be vary when you compare Manual OR Automation

Two!! When it comes to preferenc for manual or automation there should be some reasons apart from cost or time. can you guys tell me what are those

Three !! When your automating some thing its automatically automated or human will do that (I mean to say test automation)

Four!! Who got the power to think and how is interpret those thoughts when we see manua or automation tool

Five!! What is the difference between (human) manual testing and automation testing, not terms of how those works but when implemented how will be difference

Hoping for fast reponse !!!!!

Cheers,
Deepak
hi deepak,

Tomy knowledge ,


1) for carrying automation we need to purchase the tool lisence and respective add ins to support our entire appln . if the testers are not having enough techinical expertise ,they need to undergo training for specific time .
these are all adds the cost to automation .

maintaineace of the documents , builds and the environments proves to very costly.


2) automation is not replacement for manual testing .it is just a assistence to manual testing .
both the forms will b having thier own merits and demerits .

we cant choose any tool according to our convinience , for this there are many things to b analysed

1) it purely depends on the criticality ,complexity of the appln .
2)current appln involved lot of regresion and retesting

3) for doing automation , we need the presence of testers to give some insstructions to carry out the requiered process .

4) while at the initial stage , comapy management , QAand PM will decide the type of project depending on that a particulor tool will b choosen

5) for both manual or automation we need to fallow the directives given by our management interms of docs, process and metodes .

u will b directed everything like 1) what hasto b done
2) when to start
3) how to start
The company prefers Manual Testing on several aspects.

1. Huge cost
2. Cannot automate all areas in an application
3. Lack of expertisation
4. Creative test cannot be done using automation.
5. Automation is used mostly for Regression testing

RSS

TTWT Magazine


Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

© 2020   Created by Quality Testing.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service